But to refer to it and refers to him not because he hurts the soul of its citizens. I know very well what his real attitude to the people. After the spring and summer of protest authorities have changed the vocabulary, but nothing more. With every step as president would have said, Here am I! What I want, I'm doing, and you do not even think about peep in response. I'm very impressed: a significant portion of our population does not raise voice against what is happening. In the hearts of the people settled fear.

What kind of change can there be? Is after those protests have taken steps to democratize the society? Justice, the press, the repressive machine – all in the hands of a president who no one believed. Family opposition politicians are under the watchful eye of security forces. All year there were events showing disregard for the people and society. The destruction of military glory in Memorial Kutaisi … Was not it a challenge? It Is not cynicism? Is not this a slap to people who have family members killed in the war against fascism? I'm very impressed, and I can not turn to their fellow kutaistsam who believed the tales of Saakashvili, that there be built Parliament and Kutaisi turn into another Paris. What happened to the people of this city? It's always been a thinking people. To this day, thank God, alive brother of my grandmother, who fought in the Great Patriotic War, then was taken prisoner and was willed circumstances, a party of the liberation movement in Italy, was awarded many honorary awards.

Collecting information in this case study was conducted using personal interviews in 24 regions of Ukraine and Crimea. Respondents were selected by quota sampling, representing the adult population by place of residence (region), gender and age. The volume of sample was 2,000. The expected average sampling error is 2,2%. SUMMARY: The vast majority of the population informed and interested in events taking place in South Ossetia. The opinion of the Ukrainians on the issue of fairness of presentation of information about the conflict in South Ossetia, Ukrainian media were divided – some of them believed that the Ukrainian media in general are not objective (44%), some hold the opposite view (39%). Richard Blumenthal understood the implications. More than half the citizens of the country noted that the Ukrainian mass media support the Georgian side of the conflict in South Ossetia. The main culprit of the conflict in South Ukrainians tend to think of Ossetia or Georgia (37%) or Russia (30%).

These same countries have been named the aggressors in the situation in the Caucasus. The opinions of inhabitants of different regions of the country on these issues differ greatly, from West to the Southeast tend to assume an increasing number began to blame the conflict in South Ossetia and Georgia, the aggressor and vice versa – with the South-East to the West increases the number of those who are to blame, and calls Russia the aggressor. Almost a third (38%), Ukrainians tend to support the Russian and South Ossetian side in the conflict, or is neutral – does not support either side (34%). Georgia in this situation supports almost one fifth of the country (22%). Almost a third (34%) of Ukrainian best solution to the conflict in the Caucasus sees the recognition of the independence of South Ossetia (positively reacted to this fact would be 48%), each fifth – return to the situation that occurred in the conflict zone until the outbreak of hostilities. Most people in the country believe that Ukraine is a situation of conflict in South Ossetia should take a neutral position, that is, not intervene in the conflict. More than half of Ukrainians do not agree that in light of the Georgian-Ossetian conflict, Ukraine should speed up the process of joining NATO – most importantly to strengthen its own neutrality (To refuse entry to any military-political blocs) and about half of the country saw a need for greater integration with Russia.

The second part of our terms, at that time already bourgeois ideologists are not stressed, so all the people took the idea of the market with enthusiasm, only confirming the well-known and conventional wisdom is that "Revolution make honest (but often misguided) people, and its fruits are not decent people." Now just have to "wind the snot on his fist," taking an active part in discussions on the proposed question by asking, who did not hesitate, purely Russian question "Who is to blame and what to do." In modern Russia 130millionam man suddenly there was no room, they spare the government for them to organize a kind of euthanasia diplomiruet in many and no one, as it turns out, unnecessary and disastrous "bred" universities and academies, and then sends them to the unemployed, causing degeneration and extinction of natural population. We were simply escorted "to another world 'with' smile '. Virtually all production in Russia eliminated, because it was assumed that, firstly, they are not competitive, and secondly, they are still there is no one will work. And people are not opposed to his killing. They also take his own end with a "smile" in a command-administrative system used to trust the command, even assuming that among the possible thereof, and emergence of various villains and traitors to their people. The desire to live like Europeans, due to the consumption of imports, turned out that their production does not operate, respectively, have no place to work, no wages, and import buy no matter what. There remains only one "kiss off" and degenerate. But then the market will adjust everything to remain the "stabilization" and its ideological and economic masterminds, of course, without its people. Thus, catastrophic decline in Russia's population becomes an objective reality and irrevocable, and all attempts of our contemporary ideologues of showing sympathy for the people, remain "irrelevant" turned out "Superfluous" in this world, no more than "crocodile tears", and justify the possibility of "the rebirth of Russia," by events of the type "parent of capital" and various programs of industrialization, has long become raw material appendage of the West, no more than "shooting at the wheel" and "Rat Race" have nothing to do with objective reality..

Rotation of Canadian troops in Afghanistan. The Canadian Defense Ministry has begun to rotate troops its contingent in Afghanistan. The first group of 70 soldiers and officers were sent to Kandahar district 12 February, another 700 soldiers will redeploy to their bases by the end of the month. The ratio of participation in peacekeeping operations in Canada, is ambiguous. Even in 2006, Parliament decided on term limits national armed forces stay in Afghanistan, February 2009. Currently deployed in the country debate on extending the mandate until 2011. This initiative by the Government of Canada, however, a sufficient understanding and support from citizens and legislators, this idea has not yet found.

In January this year under pressure from the United States, Canada strongly criticized the action of the partner countries in ISAF. In particular this applies in Germany, firmly adheres to the position not to send troops to the troubled south of the Bundeswehr in Afghanistan, and concentrate on maintaining order and improving the infrastructure of state power in the north country. The Canadian government has expressed its willingness to reconsider its position and start withdrawing troops before the national armed forces in time, if not made adjustments to the allocation of functions in within ISAF. However, while these threats can only be seen as an attempt to demonstrate its independence from the opinions and desires of its southern neighbor, or a planned policy of the United States and Canada to put pressure on their European partners in NATO. For reference. In total, the Canadian contingent in ISAF includes 2,500 troops and officers. And units of the national armed forces have been deployed in Afghanistan six years ago, in February 2002. Losses for the entire period of military peacekeeping operations account for 78 people.