Hitler thus violated the Munich agreement he signed. But it was only the beginning. March 21 Germany demanded that Poland's agreement to transfer it to Danzig (Gdansk). March 22 German troops occupied the Memel (Klaipeda), which belonged to Lithuania. In April, Italy invaded Albania and occupied it. The collapse of the appeasement policy became evident. In public opinion, and England, and France a turning point: it became It is clear that further concessions to the aggressors are impossible. Governments are now demanding greater rigidity and determination with respect to Germany.
Britain and France have exchanged notes on mutual assistance in case of attack. During the March – April 1939 all the states bordering with Germany provided the guarantees of military assistance in case of an attack on them. Began a belated military preparations. The immediate threat of military conflict with Germany and Italy immediately raised the question of a possible Soviet role in it. With respect to Germany in principle two possible approaches: either try to negotiate with Hitler, or to fight against it. And she and the other politicians to make the USSR chance to be strengthening its influence in world affairs. However, anti-communism of Hitler, his massacre of the German Communists, the Soviet leadership did not leave a choice. Since 1933 it has become actively support the policy collective security offered by the French Foreign Minister Louis Barthou. This policy was aimed at preserving European status quo, that is the immutability of existing borders. Real success to the creation of system of collective security was signed in 1935 the Franco-Soviet Mutual Assistance Treaty, although the contract and did not include military items, but in any case, the road was opened a joint action against potential aggressor.
An in-depth analysis is not required nor suffer weather plaguing the people of amphibious culture of our country, especially for those who live in the Momposina depression, to understand their claims and its revelation for him means more Pacific, the democratic and participatory! and with just cause to pretend its political and administrative autonomy that will ensure them a better future. The initiative to create a sub-regional governmental entity to organize policy, administrative, economic, social and culturally, a la Momposina depression is a sound proposal by which the territorial rearrangement is a necessary instrument for democracy that allows you to empower marginalized people face their destiny, consolidate their autonomy, legitimacy and development, equitable, productive and sustainable; the economy that revolves around is redistributed to the rentiers that appropriate territorial public resources preventing to arrive to the regions and the population who is his destiny, and is desacumula the concentration of centralized power that keeps drowned any chance of self management of the periphery. Centralization and despotism were born the same day, and with them the misery and the ignorance of crowds 1 the challenge of the current constitutional framework as a social State of law, is to democratize public and relegitimar equity for a coexistence pacifica. La Momposina depression has been shared by two or three departments, and none has been able to manage or plan their development; They have given unfair treatment that has not been able to leave smallholding, its wealth of this diaper and don’t even have shorts, but now is the time to put the long, doing a forward planning with a sustainable and self-sufficient development model, starting from the potentiation of their wealth that allows us to determine which can be use and about that lay the Foundation on how to structure your administrative and economic policy. It is time that this area off of paternalism Central station to which they belong; plan and confront their own development and counteract the inequality is the best I have been able to propose the peoples of this area that only they are seen and remembered when media advertised the floods that suffer, but nobody remembers or view the abandonment, poverty and other factors that influence the poor living conditions in which they are because of lack of attention and policies of regional Governmentsthat never have them equipped with basic infrastructures as the public services, or has established les rules to sort its economy which provide opportunities for a better way of life.
March 10, 2008 seems to be that the tensions between Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela are dissipating. I say, seems to be because when Chavez is involved in any issue, anything is possible and but explains the fact of wanting to lead a war without a valid reason for Venezuela is true that actions carried out by Uribe’s Government were serious violations to the Ecuadorian sovereignty. Perhaps he thought Uribe justified its military action in the suspicions I had about the Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa support the FARC. You will have also imagined that in this way could be a blow to public opinion in Colombia who was observing how Chavez assumed a role in the negotiations with the FARC. It is true that the Santo Domingo Summit served to soothe tensions. This brought tranquility to the Colombian people, but especially for businessmen who surely thought that it wasn’t the best time to enter in conflict with neighbouring countries. Is that the economic context current is not the most propitious for Colombia to put at risk a major portion of their income for exports. Colombian exports represent around 18% of its GDP and more than 60% of them goes to the United States.