This attitude discloses a society that still reluta in accepting the occured changes in the institution family. If it cannot affirm that this or that model of family is worse, or better. It can be tried to understand and to learn to coexist it. Today the mother passes hours is of house, to the times in such a way how much the father. The problem of the woman, in special, started to be to conciliate wage-earning work with domestic tasks, mainly the care with the children. Little is the time that the parents can dedicate they. In comparison to the families of the past, this is an enormous difference that brings consequncias for the familiar relations and the development of the children.
With this, the families are obliged to constitute different environments for its members, which also are in permanent change. As it could not leave of being, the education suffers the consequncias from these facts. In this direction, Sheep (2005, p.12) affirms that ' ' the parents are terceirizando education of its children. They are delivering the children, and are leaving to exert the pedagogical paper, the paper of educators who them cabe' '. She is interesting to observe that this if of in such a way in the layers of high purchasing power, how much in most devoid. Families of middle class and upper middle, that is the ones that can, pays what she will be necessary for specialists and passes all the responsibility of its children for these.
The families poor also pass many hours are of house and deliver its children for communitarian day-care centers, public schools, or known people, relatives or not. This is a common problem to all the classrooms in general. In its study on day-care centers and daily pay-schools, Oliveira (1999, p.17-23) discoursed on the subject saying that, …, moreover, another problem that contributed for the changes which I relate, was what she occurred, mainly, between the population that started to live in the great urban centers.